-
Posts
321 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Oxblood Beagle's Achievements
28
Reputation
-
AG 10/AN 14 Finale
Oxblood Beagle replied to Devotary of Spontaneity's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Woah how do you know that, NewPlayer123 ō_ō -
AG 10/AN 14 Finale
Oxblood Beagle replied to Devotary of Spontaneity's topic in Sanderson Elimination
OK here are my guesses: -
AG 10/AN 14 Finale
Oxblood Beagle replied to Devotary of Spontaneity's topic in Sanderson Elimination
@Devotary of Spontaneity ? -
AG 10/AN 14 Finale
Oxblood Beagle replied to Devotary of Spontaneity's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I only proposed a draw on D4 for village cred, I didn't actually mean it @ Scorp too. A win is a win, you should own it!! Technicalities are in place for a reason, and I did 'choose' the coinflip, in a way. I had some pretty insanely wrong ID reads during early game, especially for Cham lol. Really curious about Vulture. -
AG 10/AN 14 Finale
Oxblood Beagle replied to Devotary of Spontaneity's topic in Sanderson Elimination
I have some post-game thoughts but I can’t really share them before identities are revealed (because I’m so incredibly well-hidden) - so make haste with those votes yall -
AG 10/AN 14 Finale
Oxblood Beagle replied to Devotary of Spontaneity's topic in Sanderson Elimination
Oh well, the new tyian curse lives on I’ll pretend I didn’t know how this was going to end 24 hours ago when devo asked me how I wanted beagle to die ‘in case’ of a loss LOL GG! Great write ups btw @Devotary of Spontaneity (cool Avil Ejir reference) -
Yeah this was tiring. Losing two of our power roles to the filter before we got the chance to use them + being alive for so long meant I had 0 WiM especially at the end there. I hadn’t backread anything and was coming up with random arguments based off memory alone I was never going for a no-kill. My odds surely would’ve been lower than 50% if I went for that and also I’m all for ending these games quicker if I can
-
Don't remind me lol, I thought the game was functionally over or else I'd never self vote as either alignment. Because I v read you all game and will always put my personal read over Occam's Razor. Unless it's, you know, where we are now. Where I'm forced to re-evaluate after being wrong so many times. I guess I don't really see that as a balance problem when we had 2 village smokers and 1 village MB? An e!Seeker isn't really too much of a threat when there are 9 vanillagers, and realistically speaking village power roles usually tend to out themselves early anyway so I'm not sure how powerful an e!seeker is to begin with. Their posts this turn in isolation haven't been particularly inspiring but that doesn't really change the rest of their game, I don't think. I doubt they faked their reaction to Ostrich on D4 (D5?). That was/is the major selling point on v!Cham for me. What do you think their gameplan has been, if theyre elim Edit: Penguin I’ll just be real here, you can probably tell that I’ve made up my mind and things like this reinforce my view - because why are you questioning Chameleon here? You just analyzed the distro implications in depth and I’m surprised you aren’t just taking Cham’s thug claim at face value here given we had a coinshot, and only a single village protection role has flipped. 1.5 if you count the MB. A v!thug makes sense and is probably crucial to a coinshot distro, especially when the elim team had one too. Even I can see the sense in that and like I keep saying I’m not a distro speculation person. So why haven’t you clocked this yet? When you specifically spent time looking over the distro and the flipped roles? Does the village get a coinshot with just one Lurcher for protection against both that and the NK? Highly unlikely. I’m not a protection role. You aren’t a protection role. Cham’s a claimed protection role since D1 (that’s when they claimed to Mouse I think).