dannnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnex

yes and that's nonsensical, it still states that a majority of three is possible. actually, upon review, the entire rule is nonsensical. Upon a vote of players? we aren't voting players. We're voting votes. the sentence structure is fundamentally flawed. grammatically incorrect. Proper phrasing would be more like and that's still not perfect, just fixes the fundamental flaw. you still need to define "voting" better in the first place.

i refute this, the rules state “a majority of three”. there is no current process in place which states a rule may be updated automatically when it’s information is outdated. 3 is no longer a majority, but the rule is still in place as such. but its also impossible for us to have a “majority of three”, since three isn’t a majority. therefore the game can’t actually continue until we lose one player to inactivity, vote on a new proposal to change that wording (which is then able to pass since we will be able to have a majority of 3 at that point) (or vote for proposal 66 which would be able to supersede it) sry for double post editing in quotes sucks on mobile

just vote for proposal 66 and that doesn’t matter anymore retroactivity go brrr

Proposal 66: Referendum: Any proposal (e.g. even one that breaks prior rules) immediately passes once it receives a number of Yeas greater than or equal to the number of Active Players multiplied by 2/3, added to the number of current Nays. This rule applies retroactively to itself as a proposal, but not to any proposals with a Proposal Number less than 66. reasoning: you'll catch on. if you're confused by the math, its 66% of active players, with one aditional Yea needed for each Nay. So each Nay still has voting power and cancels out a Yea. Proposal 67: The Abolition of Turns: The current concept of a "turn" is removed, (e.g., the idea that it is one player's "turn" at any given moment and that they must complete (or pass) an action before play may continue), and a "turn" shall be redefined as a "Post". A "Post" is a message sent in this thread consisting of any action, proposal, or otherwise game-state-altering declaration, with the exception of casting a vote. A player may make one Post every 24 hours, with no regard given to whether any specific player, or any number of players, has made a Post before them. If a player has not made a Post for 48 continuous hours, they are considered an Inactive Player, and all rules shall apply to them as thus. reasoning: i got no fn clue whose turn it is, and this game is gonna die so fast if we keep waiting 24 hours for a player to pass. you'll notice this proposal breaks many rules, hence i need a different way to pass it, hence proposal 66. proposal 66 also breaks many rules, hence it applies retroactively to itself. Proposal 68: You Thought It'd Be That Easy?: The complete abolition and deletion of ER#3. reasoning: i mean cmon, is it really nomic if we don't jump into the deep end?

2004 - Dannex is born, and it is the most glorious day in all of human history

2000 - Dannnex snatches the 2k slot just like he did the 1k slot, solidifying his dominance over the thread.

A lot of these are spoilers depending on what you’ve read, so read on carefully. Not as far as we know. Probably not since We don’t know. It might be possible. by attacking them. idk what you’re asking here. he used his power to fight them, they lost. it wasn’t exactly a physical fight, likely happened in the spiritual realm. Not entirely sure what you’re asking, but the investiture tied to those shards still exists. also not sure what you’re asking. There is such a thing as a Splinter, which is just a concentration of investiture. Spren for example. When a shard is destroyed, it is Splintered into many smaller parts, like the Seons on sel. These two are related. A god metal is physical investiture. like how water solidifies into ice, investiture solidifies into a god metal. each shard has its own god metal. Honorblades are made of Honor’s god metal. It’s been a while since i’ve read stormlight, but I feel confident in just saying “No” to this. someone else can elaborate. I think he’d be released, but again, it’s been a while since i’ve read stormlight. i’m not sure the stormfather even could “kill himself”.