Water

I'm literally a confirmed villager, cleared by a dead Sori. Thanks for the notes, Elbereth. I won't be changing my vote, as I suspect both Lopen and SilverDragon to be Traders. Adavantos, though, to avoid possible manipulation.

@Elbereth If Ada is an Eliminator, we will have to lynch him eventually. There is no "buffer." If there are four Eliminators (our only chance of winning), and we want to lynch Ada, no matter what, we will have to factor in the Hidden ability. Cycle 6: Nine players. We lynch an Eliminator and the Eliminators kill. Cycle 7: Seven players. Lynch an Eliminator, they kill. Cycle 8: Five players. Lynch an Eliminator, they kill. Cycle 9: Three players. We lynch Ada and he Hides. He kills. Cycle 10: We lose. No matter where Ada is in that list, he can still Hide. There is no "buffer." Personally, I think he's lying about having the ability.

...... ... ...okay. Glad to know that homeschoolers are apparently the paragon of prudishness now. o.O

If he's an Eliminator with the Hidden ability, the same logic applies later on even if we kill Eliminators with perfect accuracy for the next three days. So we should absolutely lynch him now. I personally think he's lying.Btw, I accidentally clicked the downvote button instead of "Quote." Could someone upvote Clanky to fix that?

Adavantos. I don't understand why no one else sees this. We have no assurance that he actually has the Hidden ability, and if he does, and is an Eliminator, it is rather imperative that we lynch him twice in a row. Edit: Actual actual. That word is freaking hard to fit into sentences, but luckily, having no Aviar from the beginning of the game, I didn't really have to worry about hiding it.

I incidentally find an indirect accusation of Arraenae more suspicious than a direct one. Ada isn't going to be attacked at this point. He's either a villager that the Eliminators are intentionally leaving alive to get suspicion accrued on him, or he is actually an Eliminator. He's clearly a high enough valued player that the Eliminators would have him dead if they wanted it. Ada, I've heard of the "Shallan Debacle," as you say, and read it too. This tone and word choice I'm talking about is completely different than that. There, it seemed that you were genuine, even if you were using a very hard appeal to emotion. Here, I'm not getting a genuine vibe. I'm getting a "Oh people suspect me, why don't I use purple prose to try to convince them of my innocence" vibe. I don't know how much this holds true for others, but personally, I place exactly 0 stock in defenses that go "In this one other game in this specific instance, I did x, so look, I'm doing exactly the same thing again!" That looks to me like you were trying to make a post and either trying to rationalize acting a certain way, or specifically looking for an instance when you were good that you could try to emulate.

I don't really know how to say this, but Adavantos's big post responding to me felt absurdly off. It seemed like he went way overboard in pushing home exactly how "outplayed" he was in these seemingly ludicrous strategies. My original vote on him was a reaction test of sorts to see how he would respond, and now I'm almost certain he's evil. While factually accurate, the post is worded in a calculated way that tries to arouse sympathy and give off a vibe of a self-deprecating, confused villager. I don't buy it, and neither should anyone else who's read any past games with Adavantos.

PK, I'll echo your suspicions of Adavantos and Hellscythe...not so sure about Lopen, but I didn't like his last post. Ada, I'd still like an explanation of what Arraenae pointed out. You just dismissed the suspicion and never provided an explanation. My vote will stay on you, as you essentially just used your reputation of not lying about IRL to bluff your way past ever explaining yourself. That is extremely suspicious.

That's not why you're being voted; stop using strawman arguments. I'm not voting for theSilverDragon because I actually suspect you more. You do one-liner posts basically all the time until you're called out by someone, then try to delegitimize their attack of you based off of illogic. Oh and don't forget the . People have multiple suspicions, and I'm sure you're one of them. Do you have a gut bad vibe of me, or is this again just an omgus?

Unless I see a better option come the future, my vote goes on Stink. It would be quite easy to skate under the radar with the types of posts he's making, especially if he can use the defense of "It's what I always do." You've tried to lynch people as well. Would you stop if they turned out to be innocent? actual actual I still have a gut bad vibe about theSilverDragon as well. Edited to add my code in.

Adavantos. Sorry man, I was thinking of a different dude, and conflated stuff with other stuff. :/

Someone tried and failed to guess my code. >.< Unfortunately they had no Aviar. So, about the lynch. What was it based on? Arraenae pointed out something that Adavantos did; inconsistent with his usual patterns. Adavantos says something like "Oh, hahaha yeah, uhh, yeah! Haha not gonna explain that, but I'll vote for Arraenae!" So Adavantos, I have a question for you. Why is it that you feel comfortable using examples from when you were evil to establish your innocence, but are willing to lynch other people because of examples when they were evil? Saying, "She's tried to kill me before C1" doesn't really seem like a good rationale to me." You also say here that there is a "precedence" for Arraenae trying to get you killed as an Eliminator, and use that as a further reason to guilt her. Yet here, you use examples of when you were evil to try to establish your innocence. Why the double standard?

Yeah, about that earlier...I'm just messin' around. If people were taking things seriously (which I'm almost positive Stink was not), that was not my intention. I do think that immediate omgus votes, unless reasoning is provided, are petty, but no insult was meant. That said, we should definitely lynch Stink. He's hardclaimed Sori, and this attitude towards not lynching him is most likely exactly what he wants. There is no force to his reveal unless we lynch him. Plus, we'll settle once and for all whether Paranoid King is innocent. Mailliw, I'd still like to know what information you will gain from leaving Stink alive one more day.

My bad, b. Shouldn't make character assessments after only seeing about 12 pages of back and forth. Will rectify my behavior.@Mailliw73, do you actually suspect me, or are you just voting me so you can disguise it as a faulty suspicion later? What reason is there to "hold off" a day on either Stink or Kynedath?