• Announcements

    • Chaos

      Oathbringer Spoiler Policy   11/13/2017

      Oathbringer is out! Let's make our policy on spoilers clear! 1. You must preface topics with Oathbringer spoilers with the prefix [OB] in the front 2. You are only allowed to post spoilers and spoiler topics in the Oathbringer Spoiler Board, Cosmere Theories, and some select work-related forums. 3. For posts in the Oathbringer Spoiler Board you do not need to use spoiler tags inside a topic marked [OB]. For Cosmere Theories, you also do not need to put spoiler tags inside your topic if the topic has [OB] in the title. However, for Cosmere Theories, if you are adding Oathbringer stuff to an old theory without the [OB] tag, those must go in spoiler tags and you must make it obvious outside the spoiler tag that the spoiler is regarding Oathbringer content. 4. For select things that do require talking about OB spoilers, in Events, Coppermind, and Arcanum forums, those are allowed but keep OB spoilers in spoiler tags 5. Avoid and minimize spoilers in topic titles--even though those two boards will not appear in the Recent Topics ticker, topic titles still appear in Recent Activity and the forum home.  6. You aren't allowed to post Oathbringer spoilers in places other than listed, even with spoiler tags.  It will be nine months and then the Oathbringer board will be re-merged with the Stormlight board and you will not need to tag these spoilers. If you'd like to move something in the Stormlight Archive board to the Oathbringer board, to update it with new Oathbringer information, Report the post and we will happily move it to the Oathbringer spoiler board. Part-by-part Reactions Though the Oathbringer Spoiler Board will be very spoilery, very fast (maybe don't come there until you've read the book, as people do have copies that bookstores sold early), you'll have these five topics for reactions if you want to nerd out: Part 1 Reactions
      Part 2 Reactions
      Part 3 Reactions
      Part 4 Reactions
      Full Book Reactions For parts 1-4, they will not include the interludes immediately following it. On Discord All Oathbringer spoilers on Discord will be exclusively in the #oathbringer_spoilers channel for the nine month spoiler period and nowhere else.
Axies

2016-11-05 Eurocon - Barcelona, Spain

12 posts in this topic

On the second video there's a couple of intereseting questions near the end... but not much. 
I'll try to get them after if I have time.

Edited by Axies
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I asked two things:

(I'm paraphrasing, you can watch the final part of the video) 

1. Can a KR have a nahel bond with two sprens? He answered me with a RAFO 

2. The spren of truthwatchers are related directly with cultivation or the nightwatcher? He answered that the majority of sprens are a mixture of both shards. But the truthwatchers sprens where related with Cultivation. 

 

4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't he already answer the dual bond question? I seem to recall a WoB stating it was possible to have a dual bond, but it would need to be in between orders who's oaths do not contradict one another. 

Somebody else remember this?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I listen to both of them but it was hard to follow due to the translation missing parts. But I love how cool Sanderson is that must of been difficult for him. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, maxal said:

Didn't he already answer the dual bond question? I seem to recall a WoB stating it was possible to have a dual bond, but it would need to be in between orders who's oaths do not contradict one another. 

Somebody else remember this?

I do remember him answering with what you state here.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, WeiryWriter said:

I do remember him answering with what you state here.

Thanks. Do we have any idea why he RAFOed it this time around?

-1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, maxal said:

Thanks. Do we have any idea why he RAFOed it this time around?

The man does a lot of interviews and answers a lot of questions; I'm sure he can't remember which ones he's RAFOd before and which ones he's answered. This happened with Cultivation a few years back; he gave an early answer that she was alive, and then gave a lot of RAFOs after that. Same with her name, actually - there's one interview right after WoK was published, where someone asks about Cultivation, and Brandon asked them where they got that name from. He had forgotten he had put it in the book! So, I'd just chalk it up to him being human.

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Pagerunner said:

The man does a lot of interviews and answers a lot of questions; I'm sure he can't remember which ones he's RAFOd before and which ones he's answered. This happened with Cultivation a few years back; he gave an early answer that she was alive, and then gave a lot of RAFOs after that. Same with her name, actually - there's one interview right after WoK was published, where someone asks about Cultivation, and Brandon asked them where they got that name from. He had forgotten he had put it in the book! So, I'd just chalk it up to him being human.

Oh thanks. I thought he might have had other reasons for it such as he actually wrote it actually happening in the books :ph34r:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for sharing this! I love to go to Eurocons. My favourite is still the one in Sweden back in 2011 but it is always fun to be part of this awesome community.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.