• Announcements

    • Chaos

      Oathbringer Spoiler Policy   11/13/2017

      Oathbringer is out! Let's make our policy on spoilers clear! 1. You must preface topics with Oathbringer spoilers with the prefix [OB] in the front 2. You are only allowed to post spoilers and spoiler topics in the Oathbringer Spoiler Board, Cosmere Theories, and some select work-related forums. 3. For posts in the Oathbringer Spoiler Board you do not need to use spoiler tags inside a topic marked [OB]. For Cosmere Theories, you also do not need to put spoiler tags inside your topic if the topic has [OB] in the title. However, for Cosmere Theories, if you are adding Oathbringer stuff to an old theory without the [OB] tag, those must go in spoiler tags and you must make it obvious outside the spoiler tag that the spoiler is regarding Oathbringer content. 4. For select things that do require talking about OB spoilers, in Events, Coppermind, and Arcanum forums, those are allowed but keep OB spoilers in spoiler tags 5. Avoid and minimize spoilers in topic titles--even though those two boards will not appear in the Recent Topics ticker, topic titles still appear in Recent Activity and the forum home.  6. You aren't allowed to post Oathbringer spoilers in places other than listed, even with spoiler tags.  It will be nine months and then the Oathbringer board will be re-merged with the Stormlight board and you will not need to tag these spoilers. If you'd like to move something in the Stormlight Archive board to the Oathbringer board, to update it with new Oathbringer information, Report the post and we will happily move it to the Oathbringer spoiler board. Part-by-part Reactions Though the Oathbringer Spoiler Board will be very spoilery, very fast (maybe don't come there until you've read the book, as people do have copies that bookstores sold early), you'll have these five topics for reactions if you want to nerd out: Part 1 Reactions
      Part 2 Reactions
      Part 3 Reactions
      Part 4 Reactions
      Full Book Reactions For parts 1-4, they will not include the interludes immediately following it. On Discord All Oathbringer spoilers on Discord will be exclusively in the #oathbringer_spoilers channel for the nine month spoiler period and nowhere else.
Chaos

The Ultimate List of Questions for Brandon

3,479 posts in this topic

New question, I know we've always assumed that it is but is the Shard Odium held by Rayse? I don't think it says any where in WoK that he does, I know it says he holds the most dangerous of all the shards but I think that if Bavadin is a shard holder it is more likely that he is Odium, it just seems to unlikely that he would reveal the biggest danger to the world so early in the series.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can Hemalurgy steal ANY spiritual DNA? Does it require using non-allomantic metals?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New question, I know we've always assumed that it is but is the Shard Odium held by Rayse? I don't think it says any where in WoK that he does, I know it says he holds the most dangerous of all the shards but I think that if Bavadin is a shard holder it is more likely that he is Odium, it just seems to unlikely that he would reveal the biggest danger to the world so early in the series.

This has been my thinking, though the general assumption has been that Odium is Rayse. I just love the idea of them taking down Odium and being all "Alright, Rayse, the jig is up!" "What? I'm not Rayse." :o
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

well if they find out that name they'll find it out from Hoid who knows who Odium really is. And I'm pretty sure Rayse is Odium myself.

And I bet being addressed by his original name would really piss Odium off, of course, I guess lots of things probably really piss Odium off.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you think of something that wouldn't piss off Odium to some degree? Is it even physically possible for him?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet he still has a soft spot for lolcatz

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the effect created by an Aon influeced by what the Aon means or is the meaning of an Aon derived from the effect it can create?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Is the effect created by an Aon influeced by what the Aon means or is the meaning of an Aon derived from the effect it can create?

From the Elantris annotations, I would say the meaning was derived from the effect.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

could a hemalurgic spike steal the spiritual DNA of a person form Roshar or Sel?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

could a hemalurgic spike steal the spiritual DNA of a person form Roshar or Sel?

That would more than likely take a different kind of metal, if at all, since the Shard's foci are different (metal for Ruin/Preservation, unknown for the others, but unlikely to be metal). It might work if there was a Ruin+[different-shard] magic, but I guess it makes it all the more unlikely since the other magic systems are not influenced by Ruin.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally upvoted your post for using the word foci correctly. Thank you so much for not saying "focuses". Ow. It hurt to type that.

Though I have gotten into debates over the pronunciation. It's Foh-sigh (like Sci in Science) not Foh-kai. I know people love the Focus=Foh-kus ergo Foci=Foh-kai argument, but it's wrong.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm getting to these posts, soon.

I totally upvoted your post for using the word foci correctly. Thank you so much for not saying "focuses". Ow. It hurt to type that.

Though I have gotten into debates over the pronunciation. It's Foh-sigh (like Sci in Science) not Foh-kai. I know people love the Focus=Foh-kus ergo Foci=Foh-kai argument, but it's wrong.

Both are acceptable, actually. I typically prefer foci, but they can both work.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally upvoted your post for using the word foci correctly. Thank you so much for not saying "focuses". Ow. It hurt to type that.

Though I have gotten into debates over the pronunciation. It's Foh-sigh (like Sci in Science) not Foh-kai. I know people love the Focus=Foh-kus ergo Foci=Foh-kai argument, but it's wrong.

It's been several years since I took Latin, but I do remember being taught that all "c"s are hard. Hence, foh-kai.

And I would agree that observing Latin plurals in English is hardly mandatory, although it does sound better.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

New Question, Do you prefer "foci" or "focuses" as the plural of focus?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could Nightblood stop a Shardblade?

I've been waiting for the right moment to drop this tidbit. My cousin ran into Brandon in a bookstore once (crazy!) and asked him which of these two was more powerful. His response was that Nightblood is "several orders of magnitude more magical than a shardblade." It doesn't really answer your question, but it is definitely interesting, yes?

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been waiting for the right moment to drop this tidbit. My cousin ran into Brandon in a bookstore once (crazy!) and asked him which of these two was more powerful. His response was that Nightblood is "several orders of magnitude more magical than a shardblade." It doesn't really answer your question, but it is definitely interesting, yes?

That... is immensely interesting. This warrants discussion.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see this. I mean, they created Sentinence! That has to be way cooler (and take a lot more energy) than something that merely separates connections.

I have a question.

What is the schedule for annotations? I knew it used to be a biweekly thing, but it seems to have lessened. Also, with the rush to write WoK, did you end up writing annotations for it? When will we see those?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

That... is immensely interesting. This warrants discussion.

I remember when he was asked if Vasher and Vin got into a fight who would win he said Vasher would win cause Nightblood can't be pushed on by allomancy and it would give him the advantage he would need to beat her. he also said we would be seeing other types of metal that wouldnt be affected by allomancy in later books, I don't know if he meant in a later mistborn book or in a later cosmere book but it was before way of kings so I would guess that shardblade/shardplate can't be pulled or pushed if he meant a cosmere book.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Brandon has said that Shardblades are mostly immune to Pushing and Pulling (in the context of somebody asking who would win between Szeth and a Mistborn). I guess you'd need a duralumin-boosted Push or Pull to affect them.

Also Zas, Brandon has said he didn't have time to write annotations for WoK during the copyedit but he will write some when rereading it before writing Stormlight 2.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've got an interesting question. What would happen if a Kandra injested and burned Lerasium? (I would ask about Koloss, except you've said their nature has been changed). Especially since they require Hemalurgy to have sentience.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I want to know what meaning, if any, the symbols in the gems on Brandon's website have.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.