dewi Posted November 28, 2014 Report Share Posted November 28, 2014 What do the broken pieces of pottery have to do with the beads of larasium? do they somehow create the beads, like the geodes created atium? I believe there must be some way (other than harnessing the power of the mists) to creating an atium quantity amount of larasium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gjustice99 Posted November 28, 2014 Report Share Posted November 28, 2014 I think that the broken pieces of pottery were just what the lerasium was encased in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voidus Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 What do the broken pieces of pottery have to do with the beads of larasium? do they somehow create the beads, like the geodes created atium? I believe there must be some way (other than harnessing the power of the mists) to creating an atium quantity amount of larasium. The broken pieces of pottery were just what the Lerasium beads were stored in, the others were broken because they'd already been taken. The mists are essentially just another version of Lerasium, that's why it seems like there's way more Atium than Lerasium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moogle Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 This WoB may be of interest: ChaosWhy is there such an imbalance between the amount of atium and the amount of lerasium in the world? Also, why are atium and lerasium very imbalanced in Allomantic power (Lerasium is far more useful than atium, really)?Brandon SandersonThere isn't. Leras is just spread out further. He is in the mists, in the Well, and in the lerasium. Ruin's power however is considerate strictly in atium. (source) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oudeis Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 The broken pieces of pottery were just what the Lerasium beads were stored in, the others were broken because they'd already been taken. While Elend did end up breaking the bit of pottery, it wasn't necessary, i don't think. I'm pretty sure the bead was sitting on the dish like a pea on a plate. It's never flat out said one way or another, i don't think, but strongly implied. At the least, the bead was highly visible while the dish was intact. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soulcastJam Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 While Elend did end up breaking the bit of pottery, it wasn't necessary, i don't think. I'm pretty sure the bead was sitting on the dish like a pea on a plate. It's never flat out said one way or another, i don't think, but strongly implied. At the least, the bead was highly visible while the dish was intact. It seemed to me more like the bottom was completely encased and some of the sides so only part of the top half was visible. So if you turned it upside down it wouldn't fall out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts